Topper IAS Logo
Economic Survey 2025-26 | UPSC Prelims 2026

Chapter 5: Inflation — Tamed and Anchored

Global Disinflation · CPI at Historic Lows · Food Price Management · Regional Dynamics · Outlook
CPI 1.7% (FY26) Oct 2025: 0.3% — Lowest Ever India: Sharpest Disinflation Among EMDEs RBI Target Met

📋 Chapter Contents

1 Global Inflation Developments
2 India's Domestic Inflation Trajectory
3 Decrypting Core Inflation
4 Drivers of Food Disinflation
5 Government Policy Interventions
6 Agricultural Supply Environment
7 GDP Deflators & Terms of Trade
8 Regional Inflation Patterns
9 State-Level Dynamics
10 Inflation Outlook FY27
11 Concept Explainers
12 MCQs with Answers
📊

Key Inflation Numbers at a Glance

Quick Stats
1.7%
CPI Headline Inflation FY26 (Apr–Dec 2025)
0.3%
Oct 2025 CPI — Lowest ever in current series
4.62%
Core Inflation Dec 2025 (but 2.27% excl. precious metals)
−5.02%
Food Inflation Oct 2025 — Biggest monthly decline ever
CPI Headline Inflation Trend (Annual)
FY2022-23
6.7%
Post-war highs
FY2023-24
5.36%
Gradual moderation
FY2024-25
4.63%
Disinflationary
FY2025-26
2.2%
H1 avg (Apr–Sep)
FY2025-26
1.7%
Apr–Dec avg
Oct 2025
0.3%
Record low!
🏆

India's Unique Achievement: Growth + Disinflation

India recorded one of the sharpest declines in headline inflation (~1.8 pp) among major EMDEs in 2025, while simultaneously posting GDP growth of 8% in H1 FY26 — achieving disinflation without overheating. Global rating agency S&P acknowledged this, noting inflation targeting has "reaped dividends" with expectations better anchored than a decade ago.

🌐

Global Inflation Developments

Section 1

Broad-Based Global Moderation

The world saw broad-based and sustained moderation in inflation across advanced economies (AEs), emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs), and developing nations — driven by easing commodity prices (food & energy) and responsive monetary policies.

Advanced Economies (AEs)

  • Inflation stabilised at 2–3%
  • Central banks began cutting rates as inflationary pressures eased
  • Fed, ECB reduced rates amid growth concerns
  • US tariff policy created secondary uncertainty

Key Commodity Price Changes (2025)

  • FAO Food Price Index: −23.9% (Jan–Dec)
  • OPEC Basket Oil Price: −15.5%
  • Iron Ore: +2% (deflationary zone for many months)
  • Aluminium: +13%
  • Copper: +32% (AI/Data Centre demand + tight supply)

EMDE Landscape: Growth-Inflation Trade-offs

CountryInflation Trend (2025)GrowthKey Driver
IndiaSharpest decline (~−1.8 pp)8% (H1 FY26)Food supply + monetary policy
ChinaSignificant deflationBelow EMDE avg 4.2%Weak demand, excess capacity, tariff pressures
BrazilRose 4.4% → 5.2%, then easedBelow avgService inflation persistence
RussiaPersistently high inflationSubduedUkraine conflict + trade sanctions
Malaysia/Indonesia/PhilippinesModeratedVariedLower imported commodity costs
💡

EMDE Averages (2025)

EMDE average inflation: 5.3% | EMDE average GDP growth: 4.2%. India stood out — both lower inflation AND higher growth than the EMDE average, placing it in the "ideal" quadrant of the inflation-growth trade-off chart.

🇮🇳

India's Domestic Inflation Trajectory

Section 2

CPI & WPI Annual Data

YearCPI HeadlineWPI HeadlineKey Feature
2022–236.7%9.41%Post-pandemic surge
2023–245.36%−0.73%WPI in deflation
2024–254.63%2.27%Gradual disinflation
2025–26 (Apr–Dec)1.72%0.04%Lowest in current CPI series

Monthly CPI Milestones in FY26

📅

Oct 2024: Start

Disinflationary phase began with CPI at 6.2%

📉

Apr–Sep 2025: H1

CPI fell from 3.2% → 1.4%, averaging 2.2%

🎯

Oct 2025: Record

CPI at 0.3% — lowest ever in CPI 2012=100 series

⚠️

WPI vs CPI Relationship

WPI (factory-gate price) has consistently been lower than CPI and has mirrored the broad disinflationary trend, exerting a moderating effect on CPI. This means upstream input cost pressures are not translating into consumer price pressures.

💎

Decrypting Core Inflation: The Precious Metals Story

Section 3

The Apparent Stickiness of Core Inflation

Core inflation (excl. food & fuel) appeared sticky, rising from 3.5% (FY25) to ~4.3% (FY26), with December 2025 at 4.62%. This created a puzzling divergence with falling headline inflation.

🔍

The Real Culprit: Gold & Silver at Lifetime Highs

Granular analysis reveals that the apparent stickiness is largely driven by sharp increases in precious metals (gold & silver), which touched lifetime highs amid global uncertainty and safe-haven demand. When excluded, core inflation shows a declining trajectory mirroring headline.

Core Inflation Breakdown (December 2025)

MeasureDec 2025Note
Standard Core (excl. food & fuel)4.62%Appears sticky
Core excl. Petrol & Diesel (P&D)4.81%Administered prices removed
Core excl. Gold & Silver (G&S)2.27%Wedge = ~235 bps!
Core excl. both P&D and G&S2.36%Wedge = ~226 bps
📐

Key Insight: 235 Basis Points Wedge

The wedge between standard core (4.62%) and core excluding precious metals (2.27%) is ~235 basis points. Between June and December 2025, core excl. precious metals decelerated from 3.4% to 2.3%, even as standard core remained elevated at ~4.6%. Conclusion: No broad-based inflationary momentum — it's purely a precious metals phenomenon.

Four Components of Core CPI Basket

These four components account for ~1/3 of CPI basket and >60% of core measure:

Clothing & Footwear

  • Sharp fall from elevated 2023 levels
  • Responds quickly to cost/demand changes
  • Easing input costs + competitive markets

Housing

  • Declined steadily through 2023–early 2024, then stable
  • Revised infrequently (annual contracts)
  • Contributes stability to core basket

Health

  • Gradual easing from higher 2023 levels
  • Shaped by administered fees, institutional pricing
  • Moderation seen since July 2025

Transport & Communication

  • Lower on average but episodic movements
  • Driven by fares, fuel-linked services, telecom
  • Disinflationary trend since June 2025

Base Effect vs Momentum Effect

⚖️

Base Effect Dominated FY26 Disinflation

Inflation can be decomposed into: (1) Momentum effect (month-on-month current year price changes) and (2) Base effect (influence of prior year price levels). In FY26, the base effect played a dominant role — its downward influence outweighed the momentum effect in 7 out of 9 months, driving significant disinflation.

🥗

Drivers of Food Disinflation

Section 4

Key Food Inflation Milestones

📊

Food Inflation Timeline

Food inflation entered deflationary territory since June 2025. October 2025 saw the biggest monthly decline of −5.02% in the present CPI series — a historic first. This was driven by vegetables (deeply negative), pulses (declining for ~9 months), spices (deflation for 18 months), and cereals (6.2% Jan 2025 → −0.4% Dec 2025).

Component-wise Food Inflation (December 2025)

Food ComponentInflation (Dec 2025)Key Note
Vegetables (overall)Deeply negativeLed entire food disinflation
Pulses−15.1%9 months continuous decline
Spices−2.15%18 months in deflation
Cereals−0.4%From 6.2% in Jan 2025
Eggs5.12%Recovered after temporary dip
Meat & Fish4.76%Recovered after temporary dip
Milk & Products2.56%Stable throughout

TOP Commodities: Tomato, Onion, Potato, (and Garlic)

+14.4%
Tomato (Dec 2025)
−48.1%
Onion (Dec 2025)
−34.9%
Potato (Dec 2025)
−64.8%
Garlic (Dec 2025)
🧅

Government Onion Intervention: Rail Transport Scaled Up

In 2025-26, onion buffer stocks were released from September 2025 through direct retail sales at discounted prices + supplies to mandis in major consumption centres. The use of rail transport for onion movement (initiated in 2024-25) was further scaled up to ensure cost-effective market intervention.

🏛️

Government Policy Interventions in Food Markets

Section 5

Pulses Price Management

🫘

Structural Challenge

India's pulses market has structural excess demand. 2023-24 saw elevated prices due to production shortfalls and low carry-forward stocks. Domestic production recovering in FY26 supported by stable imports.

📋

Key Policy Actions

Mandi price monitoring with analytical tools for early signals. Procurement of 6.5 lakh MT in previous season. Government monitors tur acreage expansion.

Import Duty Measures on Pulses

CommodityDutyWhenRationale
Yellow Peas (close substitute for chana)30%October 2025Ahead of chana sowing season — protect farmer interests, support domestic prices
Masoor (red lentils)10%CurrentProtect domestic market
Chana (Bengal gram)10%CurrentProtect domestic market

Edible Oil Price Management

🫒

Edible Oil Structural Challenge

India imports over 50% of domestic edible oil consumption — structural excess demand. Domestic prices are highly sensitive to global prices, exchange rate, and trade policy.

ActionDateBasic Customs DutyPurpose
BCD on crude edible oils raisedSeptember 20240% → 20%Support domestic prices as global prices fell sharply
BCD on crude edible oils reducedJune 202520% → 10%Alleviate rising consumer prices as FY26 prices rose again

The duty reduction's impact is evident — edible oil inflation moderated since August 2025.

Overall Policy Effectiveness

Timely trade policy decisions, strategic buffer stock management, and targeted market interventions have enabled effective management of price cycles. Retail price volatility in pulses has been much lower in 2022-24 vs 2015-17 despite similar production challenges — demonstrating improved policy effectiveness over the decade.

🌾

Agricultural Supply: Benign Environment for Inflation

Section 6

FY26 Kharif & Rabi Performance

Kharif 2024-25 (Achievements)

  • Precipitation: ~30 states/UTs had normal or excess rainfall
  • Cereal production: Record high ~3,320 lakh tonnes (rice, wheat, coarse cereals)
  • Pulses: ~257 lakh tonnes (modest gains)
  • Oilseeds: ~430 lakh tonnes — sharp increase; led by soybean, groundnut, rapeseed-mustard

Rabi 2025-26 Sowing (as of 16 Jan 2026)

  • Total cropped area: +3.3% YoY
  • Foodgrain area: +3.0%
  • Pulses acreage: +3.8% (led by gram)
  • Oilseeds: +3.5% (rapeseed/mustard, safflower)
  • Above-normal monsoon augmented reservoir levels
🌧️

"Goldilocks Combination" in Agriculture

Below-normal temperature through most of 2025 + above-normal monsoon + augmented reservoir levels = ideal conditions for Kharif harvest and Rabi sowing momentum. This has kept food inflation at bay and will continue to do so in upcoming months.

📈

GDP Deflators: Manufacturing's Reversal in Terms of Trade

Section 7
Key Concept

GDP Deflator vs CPI/WPI

GDP deflator = Nominal GDP / Real GDP. Unlike CPI/WPI, it reflects economy-wide price movements including services and compositional changes. For a sector: Implicit Price Deflator = Nominal GVA / Real GVA (ratio around base year = 1.0).

Terms of Trade (Manufacturing vs Agriculture) = Manufacturing Deflator / Agriculture Deflator >1 → Manufacturing prices higher relative to agriculture = better ToT for manufacturing <1 → Agriculture prices higher = worse ToT for manufacturing

GDP Deflator Values by Sector (FY25, Base 2011-12)

SectorFY05 DeflatorFY25 DeflatorGrowth
Agriculture~1.02.17Fastest growing
Services~1.01.752nd fastest
Industry~1.01.55Moderate
Manufacturing~1.01.41Slowest — global competition

Manufacturing Terms of Trade Decline

📉

vs Agriculture: 50% Decline

Manufacturing ToT with agriculture: ~1.29 (FY05) → 0.65 (FY25) — a decline of 50% over 20 years. Agriculture has enjoyed government support (MSP-linked annual price increases).

📉

vs Services: 25% Decline

Manufacturing ToT with services: declined 25% to 0.81 by FY25. Services enjoy greater pricing power through brand differentiation and less global competition.

Manufacturing Share in Economy

MetricTwo Decades AgoFY25Implication
Share in GVA (current prices)17–18%~14%Declining ToT → lower nominal share
Share in GVA (constant prices)~18%~18%Real output stable
Share in Gross Value of Output (GVO)~38%~38%Actual production share stable
⚙️

Key Policy Implication: Farm-to-Fork Policies

Better terms of trade for agriculture may encourage resource shift towards farming (more land, labour returning to agriculture — both visible in India). The declining manufacturing ToT calls for "Farm-to-Fork" policies — streamlining supply chains from producers to consumers, reducing intermediaries, emphasising freshness and local sourcing. India Inc.'s profit margins have not shown stress, suggesting cost-cutting innovations are preserving competitiveness.

🗺️

Regional Inflation Patterns: Rural vs Urban

Section 8

Headline Inflation (Dec 2025)

  • Rural CPI: 0.8%
  • Urban CPI: 2.0%
  • In 2023-24: Rural > Urban (food weight higher in rural basket)
  • In 2025: Food deflation → Rural fell below Urban

Core Inflation: Rural vs Urban

  • Rural core marginally > urban core but gap is modest and stable
  • Both follow smooth, gradual adjustment path
  • Once food & fuel excluded: broadly similar pricing behaviour
  • Rural shows greater volatility in headline (food weight)
⚠️

Why Rural Inflation is More Volatile

Rural consumption basket assigns a higher weight to food items compared to urban baskets. Since food prices are inherently more volatile (weather-sensitive, seasonal), rural inflation exhibits greater volatility. When food prices surge, rural inflation spikes more; when food deflates, rural inflation falls more sharply.

🏛️

State-Level Inflation Dynamics

Section 9

FY26 State-Level Highlights

States Breaching 6% Tolerance Band

In FY26 (Apr–Dec), Kerala (8.05%) and Lakshadweep (6.69%) exceeded the RBI's upper tolerance band of 6%. All other states remained within the 2-6% band or below. This is an important factual data point for UPSC.

Key State Inflation Data (FY26 Apr-Dec)

State/UT2022-232023-242024-252025-26 (Apr-Dec)
Kerala5.794.975.898.05 ⚠️
Lakshadweep7.283.573.056.69 ⚠️
Jammu & Kashmir6.344.154.483.60
Karnataka5.495.794.933.14
Punjab6.085.534.163.27
Delhi4.002.552.400.96
Uttar Pradesh7.075.765.300.30
Assam6.544.595.060.16
Telangana8.616.363.670.20
Bihar5.745.846.040.01
All India6.665.364.631.72

State-Level Inflation: Key Statistical Findings

📊

Persistence of Inflation Gaps

AR(1) coefficient for all states > 0.7 → inflation differentials are positively persistent (not purely transitory). South & Northeast states tend to have above-average inflation with higher persistence. Delhi, HP tend to be below-average.

💰

Wages & Inflation Correlation

States with above-national-average wage rates → higher inflation (positive association). Higher GSDP growth also associated with higher state inflation. COVID had a structural step-up influence on prices.

🏭

Industrial Output: Benign Effect on Inflation

Higher share of industrial output in state GVA shows negative association with state inflation — confirming supply-side efficiencies in manufacturing dampen price pressures. GST imposition was found to be price neutral for state-level inflation differentials.

🔭

Inflation Outlook for FY27

Section 10

Official Projections

AgencyFY26 ProjectionFY27 ProjectionQ1 FY27Q2 FY27
RBI2.0% (revised down from 2.6%)3.9%4.0%
IMF2.8%4.0%

Note: RBI revised FY26 downward from 2.6% to 2.0% due to good kharif harvest and healthy rabi sowing.

Upside Risks to FY27 Inflation

💱

Currency Depreciation

INR depreciation could pave way for imported inflation. Edible oils particularly vulnerable (50%+ imported).

🪙

Precious Metals

Gold & silver safe-haven demand may continue. If pace of 2025 is not sustained, core excl. precious metals may be higher, not lower.

🌍

Geopolitics

Geopolitics may disrupt expected commodity price declines. Copper demand from AI data centres & green tech keeps its price elevated.

Downside Factors (Keeping Inflation Benign)

Factors Working to Keep Inflation Low

Strong Rabi sowing (+3.3%) Record kharif harvest Adequate reservoir storage Global commodities declining ~7% FY27 (World Bank) Crude oil subdued — oversupply GST rate rationalisation pass-through Increased fertiliser supply keeping input prices in check

📝

Economic Survey's Conclusion

India's inflation rate — both headline and core excluding precious metals — will likely be higher in FY27 than FY26. However, this is unlikely to be a concern as it would still be within the RBI's target range of 4% (±2%), aligned with the convergence that monetary policy aimed for. The disinflation of FY26 was exceptional and not expected to sustain indefinitely.

🧠

Concept Explainers: Master the Fundamentals

Section 11
Concept 1

CPI vs WPI vs GDP Deflator

CPI (Consumer Price Index): Measures retail price of a basket of goods/services consumed by households. Base year 2012=100. Reflects demand-side inflation. Used by RBI for inflation targeting.

WPI (Wholesale Price Index): Measures price at factory gate/wholesale level. Base year 2011-12. Reflects supply/production-side prices. Lower than CPI typically indicates no cost-push transmission.

GDP Deflator: Economy-wide price index. Nominal GDP / Real GDP. Covers all goods & services in economy. Not a fixed basket — adjusts with output composition. Best for understanding sectoral terms of trade.

Concept 2

Headline vs Core vs Food Inflation

Headline Inflation: Total CPI — includes all components including food and fuel. Most volatile because food and energy prices fluctuate with weather, geopolitics.

Core Inflation: CPI excluding food & beverages and fuel & light. Measures underlying or structural inflation. More stable indicator for monetary policy. Currently being distorted by gold/silver surge.

Food Inflation: CPI component for food & beverages only. Given food's high weight in Indian CPI basket (especially rural), this largely drives headline inflation movements.

Concept 3

Inflation Targeting Framework (Flexible IT)

India adopted Flexible Inflation Targeting in 2016. RBI is mandated to maintain CPI inflation at 4% with ±2% tolerance band (2–6%). The target is reviewed every 5 years. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) — 6 members (3 RBI + 3 external) — decides on repo rate.

Failure trigger: Average CPI outside 2-6% band for 3 consecutive quarters → RBI must submit report to government explaining why and what remedial action it will take

Success: S&P noted that inflation targeting has "reaped dividends" — inflation expectations better anchored, moving from double-digit (2008-14) to 5.5% average (last 3 years) and recently at lower bound of target.

Concept 4

Base Effect in Inflation

Year-on-year inflation = Momentum Effect + Base Effect

Base Effect: If prices were very HIGH last year → this year's YoY rate looks LOW (even if prices are still rising) Base Effect: If prices were very LOW last year → this year's YoY rate looks HIGH FY26 example: Food prices were high in FY25 (base year) → Low base → Makes FY26 food inflation look even more deflated

Key FY26 finding: Base effect dominated in 7 out of 9 months — its downward influence outweighed momentum effect, driving much of the observed disinflation. This is partly why disinflation cannot be taken entirely at face value.

Concept 5

Terms of Trade (ToT) for Sectors

Terms of Trade measures the relative price of a sector's output vis-à-vis another sector. For manufacturing vs agriculture:

ToT (Manufacturing vs Agriculture) = Manufacturing GDP Deflator / Agriculture GDP Deflator FY05: ~1.29 (Manufacturing was 29% more expensive than agriculture) FY25: ~0.65 (Agriculture is now ~54% more expensive than manufacturing!)

Implications: Agriculture getting more expensive = better incomes for farmers + resource reallocation toward farming. Manufacturing facing cost pressures from agricultural inputs while global competition prevents price increases. India Inc. responding with cost-cutting and labor-saving innovations rather than passing costs to consumers.

Concept 6

Imported Inflation & Exchange Rate Pass-Through

When a country's currency depreciates, imports become more expensive in local currency terms, leading to imported inflation. India is vulnerable in:

• Edible oils (50%+ imported) • Crude oil (net importer) • Precious metals (large importer) • Electronics & industrial inputs

The trade-off: INR depreciation helps exports (as shown in Chapter 4 ARDL analysis) but creates imported inflation risks. In FY25, INR depreciated ~5.4% — contained impact due to global commodity price softness.

Imported Inflation Risk = Depreciation % × Share of Imports in CPI basket × Pass-through coefficient
Concept 7

Buffer Stock Operations & Market Intervention

Government maintains buffer stocks of essential commodities (onions, pulses, edible oils) to release into the market when prices spike, preventing excessive inflation. Key mechanisms:

Price Stabilisation Fund (PSF): Used to procure and hold buffer stocks of pulses and edible oils

NAFED/NCCF: Government agencies that procure at MSP and release buffers

Rail transport for onions: New 2024-25 initiative — using railways to quickly move onions from surplus (Maharashtra, Rajasthan) to deficit regions, reducing transport costs

Import duty calibration: Raising duties when domestic prices fall too low (protects farmers), cutting duties when prices rise too high (protects consumers)

Concept 8

Disinflation vs Deflation

Disinflation: Inflation is still positive but falling. Prices are still rising, just at a slower rate. India's headline CPI went from 6.7% → 1.7% — this is disinflation (prices rising at lower rate).

Deflation: Prices are actually falling — negative inflation rate. India's food inflation entered deflation (below 0%) since June 2025. October 2025 food inflation was −5.02%. Some individual items like onion (−48.1%), garlic (−64.8%) experienced severe deflation.

⚠️ Deflation can be harmful too: If consumers expect prices to fall further, they delay purchases (like China in 2025 — weak domestic demand). Sustained deflation can reduce producer incomes and trigger a deflationary spiral.

Practice MCQs — UPSC Prelims Style

1 According to the Economic Survey 2025-26, which of the following statements about India's CPI inflation in 2025-26 is correct?
(a) Average CPI was 4.6% in Apr–Dec 2025
(b) CPI reached a record low of 0.3% in October 2025
(c) Food inflation remained positive throughout FY26
(d) Core inflation declined below headline inflation
Answer: (b) — October 2025 saw CPI at 0.3%, the lowest reading in the current CPI series (base year 2012=100). Average for Apr–Dec was 1.72% (not 4.6%). Food inflation entered deflation since June 2025 (went negative). Core inflation remained above headline (4.62% vs ~1.3% headline).
2 The Economic Survey 2025-26 reveals that the apparent stickiness of core inflation in India during FY26 was primarily driven by:
(a) Rising housing and health inflation
(b) Increased fuel and light prices
(c) Sharp increases in gold and silver prices
(d) Elevated transport and communication costs
Answer: (c) — The wedge between standard core (4.62%) and core excluding gold & silver (2.27%) was ~235 basis points. Between June–December 2025, core excl. precious metals decelerated from 3.4% to 2.3% even as standard core stayed at ~4.6%. Housing/health actually eased; transport showed disinflationary trend since June 2025.
3 Which of the following states/UTs exceeded the RBI's upper tolerance band of 6% for headline inflation during April–December 2025?
(a) Kerala and Manipur
(b) Kerala and Lakshadweep
(c) Lakshadweep and J&K
(d) Kerala and Karnataka
Answer: (b) — Kerala (8.05%) and Lakshadweep (6.69%) were the only states/UTs that breached the RBI's upper tolerance band of 6% during April–December 2025. All other states remained within the 2–6% band or below.
4 With respect to India's edible oil policy during 2024-25 and 2025-26, which sequence of actions is correct?
(a) BCD raised to 20% (June 2025) → reduced to 10% (Sept 2024)
(b) BCD raised to 20% (Sept 2024) → reduced to 10% (June 2025)
(c) BCD raised to 10% (Sept 2024) → raised to 20% (June 2025)
(d) BCD removed (Sept 2024) → reimposed at 20% (June 2025)
Answer: (b) — As global edible oil prices fell sharply in 2024, the government imposed a Basic Customs Duty (BCD) of 20% on crude edible oils in September 2024 to support domestic producers. Subsequently, as prices rose again in FY26, BCD was reduced to 10% in June 2025 to ease consumer price pressures. Impact visible as edible oil inflation moderated since August 2025.
5 According to Economic Survey 2025-26, in how many months during FY26 did the base effect play a dominant disinflationary role over the momentum effect?
(a) 4 out of 9 months
(b) 5 out of 9 months
(c) 6 out of 9 months
(d) 7 out of 9 months
Answer: (d) — The base effect played a dominant role in shaping the FY26 inflation trajectory, with its downward influence outweighing the momentum effect in 7 out of 9 months, thereby exerting significant disinflationary pressure. This means much of the observed low inflation was partly a statistical artifact of high prices in the previous year.
6 The Economic Survey 2025-26 analysis on GDP deflators shows that the terms of trade of the manufacturing sector relative to agriculture declined by approximately _____ between FY05 and FY25.
(a) 25%
(b) 35%
(c) 50%
(d) 15%
Answer: (c) — Manufacturing ToT with agriculture declined from ~1.29 (FY05) to 0.65 (FY25) — a decline of approximately 50% over 20 years. Agriculture GDP deflator reached 2.17 (base 2011-12) while manufacturing reached only 1.41, reflecting government MSP support for agriculture and global competition for manufacturing. Manufacturing ToT with services declined by ~25% (to 0.81).
7 Consider the following statements about India's food inflation in FY26: 1. Spice prices remained in deflation for 18 months 2. Garlic prices fell by approximately 65% in December 2025 3. Cereal inflation rose throughout FY26 4. Food inflation entered deflationary territory from June 2025 Which of the above statements are correct?
(a) 1 and 3 only
(b) 2 and 4 only
(c) 1, 2 and 4 only
(d) All of 1, 2, and 4 (Statement 3 is wrong)
Answer: (d) — Statements 1, 2, and 4 are correct. Spices were in deflation for 18 months; Garlic fell ~64.8% (Dec 2025); Food entered deflation from June 2025. Statement 3 is WRONG — cereal inflation declined throughout FY26, from 6.2% (January 2025) to −0.4% (December 2025).
8 The RBI's revised inflation projection for FY26 (as of December 2025) and IMF's projection for FY27 respectively are:
(a) 2.6% and 3.5%
(b) 2.0% and 3.5%
(c) 2.0% and 4.0%
(d) 2.8% and 4.0%
Answer: (c) — In December 2025, RBI revised its FY26 inflation projection downward from 2.6% to 2.0% (due to good kharif harvest and healthy rabi sowing). IMF projected 2.8% for FY26 and 4.0% for FY27. RBI's Q1 and Q2 FY27 forecasts stand at 3.9% and 4.0%. Option (d) has IMF's FY26 figure incorrectly attributed to RBI.
9 The 'Farm-to-Fork' policy approach mentioned in the Economic Survey 2025-26 in the context of manufacturing terms of trade aims to:
(a) Increase MSP for farmers to improve their income
(b) Encourage more land under food crops for export
(c) Streamline supply chains from producers to consumers, reducing intermediaries
(d) Privatise government food procurement agencies
Answer: (c) — The Economic Survey advocates Farm-to-Fork policies that "streamline the supply chain from producers to consumers — emphasising freshness, local sourcing, and fewer intermediaries, thereby reducing overall cost in the economy." This is suggested as a response to declining manufacturing ToT, since rising agricultural input costs hurt manufacturing margins.
10 According to the Economic Survey 2025-26's state-level inflation analysis, which finding about the determinants of state-level inflation is INCORRECT?
(a) Higher wage rates are associated with higher state-level inflation
(b) Higher GSDP growth rates are associated with higher state inflation
(c) Higher industrial output share is associated with lower state inflation
(d) GST imposition was associated with significant price increases at state level
Answer: (d) — The Economic Survey panel regression model (2014-15 to 2024-25) found GST imposition to be price neutral for state-level inflation differentials. Statements (a) wage-inflation positive, (b) GSDP growth positive, and (c) industrial output negative association are all correctly stated as per the Survey's findings. COVID had a structural step-up influence, but GST was neutral.