Question: What is the argument against legalizing queer marriages that the author argues is flawed?

Question

It is not a matter of judicial interference, but one of interpreting the statutes.

Legalizing queer marriages will destroy the concept of family.

The laws pertaining to marriage necessitate procreation.

Conventional conceptualizations of family and marriage are facing evolutionary challenges.

Answer 1

Answer: (b) Only two statements

 

Explanation: The article states that the argument that legalizing queer marriages will destroy the concept of family is flawed. Therefore, statement 2 is false. The author argues against the argument that legalizing queer marriages is not a matter of judicial interference, but one of interpreting the statutes. Therefore, statement 1 is correct. The article does not mention the other two statements, so statements 3 and 4 are false.