Analysis: Special Session of Indian Parliament and Its Mystery
Introduction
The Indian Government has announced a fiveday special session of Parliament scheduled from September 18. A cloud of secrecy surrounds the proceedings as the Opposition claims that they were not consulted about the session's agenda. This secrecy could undermine the democratic spirit of the Parliament, where transparency and dialogue should be a norm.
Lack of Consultation with Opposition
Example
The Opposition has raised concerns about the absence of consultation before the special session. According to the parliamentary bulletin issued on September 13, only the agenda for the first day has been revealed, leaving the rest in mystery. The absence of dialogue undermines the Opposition's role in a democracy where it is supposed to check the ruling party's powers.
Controversial Agenda
Example
The known agenda includes a Bill on altering the appointment process of the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners. This Bill is already contentious as it allegedly gives excessive control to the ruling party over these critical appointments. It thus poses a question on the Government's intention and its impact on the democratic setup.
Significance of the Debate Topic
Example
The Government also proposes a debate on 'Parliamentary Journey of 75years starting from Samvidhan Sabha – Achievements, Experiences, Memories and Learnings'. This could potentially be a farewell address to the present Parliament building, designed by Sir Herbert Baker and Sir Edwin Lutyens and inaugurated in 1927 by Viceroy Lord Irwin. The debate could serve as a distraction from other critical issues that need parliamentary scrutiny.
New Parliament Building
Example
The new Parliament building, inaugurated on May 28 by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has not yet been used for any sessions. The government has not provided any official explanation, raising questions about the readiness of the new structure and the timing of its inauguration.
Need for Transparency and Dialogue
Example
The Government seems to circumvent dialogue with the Opposition. For instance, changes to Article 370 were put before Parliament in August 2019 without any prior notice. Such lack of transparency affects the smooth functioning of the democratic institution and diminishes its credibility.
Conclusion
The secrecy around the special session could be counterproductive for the Government and the democratic process in India. A Parliament is not merely a building or a procedural event but an embodiment of democratic values like transparency, dialogue, and checks and balances. It's essential that these principles are not compromised for shortterm gains.
