China has once again used a sporting event, the Asian Games, to score geopolitical points, this time by denying entry to three Indian Wushu players from Arunachal Pradesh. The move resulted in Union Sports Minister Anurag Thakur canceling his visit to China. This latest incident has highlighted the persisting distrust and communication gaps between India and China, adding that full normalization of relations will only occur after border issues are resolved.
Key Points and Examples
Politicization of Sports
China's denial of entry to Indian athletes has made it clear that Beijing is willing to politicize sporting events to score geopolitical points.
Example: Earlier, China had selected the People’s Liberation Army’s commander involved in the Galwan Valley clash as one of the torchbearers for the Winter Olympics.
Last Minute Visa Denial
The denial of entry for Indian athletes from Arunachal Pradesh was particularly striking as they were issued digital accreditations, which should have enabled visafree travel.
Example: The Ministry of External Affairs described China's action as "targeted and premeditated."
Weak International Response
Despite China's controversial actions, global sports organizations have been reluctant to speak out against it.
Example: The acting President of the Olympic Council of Asia, Randhir Singh, only mentioned that the matter was being discussed and didn't explicitly condemn China's actions.
Bilateral Relations Between India and China
This incident highlights the distrust and the lack of adequate communication channels between the two nations.
Example: India has made it clear that normal relations will not be restored until there is a complete disengagement process along the Line of Actual Control.
Arunachal Pradesh and China’s Visa Policy
China has a history of issuing stapled visas to residents of Arunachal Pradesh, reflecting its territorial claims over the region.
Example: In July, three Wushu players from Arunachal Pradesh were issued stapled visas to take part in the World University Games in Chengdu.
Conclusion
The politicization of sports events by China serves as a grim reminder of the fragile state of IndoChina relations. It also raises questions about the efficacy of international sports bodies in dealing with such diplomatically sensitive issues. Unless there is an overhaul in China's approach towards its border with India, such incidents could continue to tarnish bilateral relations.
