# Analysis of "Enormity of climate change is no excuse to resort to risky mitigation strategies"
## Introduction
The article dated 21st September 2023 from the Delhi Print Edition addresses the urgency of climate change mitigation in India and globally, while questioning the ethical and scientific validity of extreme solutions like Solar Radiation Management (SRM). The text critiques the report of the Climate Overshoot Commission, emphasizing that high-risk solutions should not replace traditional and more effective climate mitigation strategies.
### The Dilemma: Climate Change vs. Risky Solutions
The article opens with a distressing fact about India experiencing its driest August in a century. Although it's not yet confirmed whether this is directly linked to climate change, the situation draws attention to the increasing need for climate change mitigation. The article specifically focuses on SRM, an idea that proposes to cool the Earth's surface by blocking incoming solar radiation.
#### Example
India's driest August serves as a critical reminder that any short-term solution may result in long-term detrimental effects, thereby demanding a well-thought-out approach towards climate mitigation.
### SRM: A Double-Edged Sword
The article highlights the dangers of SRM, particularly its planet-wide consequences and the lack of accountability mechanisms. SRM can inadvertently affect weather systems, potentially leading to unforeseen disasters in countries other than the one implementing it.
#### Example
The article cites a hypothetical situation where an SRM experiment could cause excessive rainfall in the Horn of Africa, leading to a locust swarm that devastates crops in Pakistan and India.
### The Climate Overshoot Commission Report: A Critical Review
The report of the Climate Overshoot Commission calls for extensive research before implementing SRM technologies. While the report advises caution, it does not entirely rule out SRM as a potential solution. This approach is problematic because it diverts focus from more effective and safer mitigation strategies, such as emission cuts.
#### Example
The report's focus on SRM as a 'potential solution' could sideline other effective methods, like investing in renewable energy sources or promoting sustainable agricultural practices.
### The Question of Justice
The article argues that the Commission’s stance is misleading, especially when claiming to act in the interests of developing countries. It suggests that economic growth agendas have often been pursued at the cost of climate justice in these nations.
#### Example
In the context of India, the adoption of risky mitigation strategies may provide temporary relief but can obstruct the long-term goal of sustainable development and equitable resource distribution.
## Conclusion
While the urgency to mitigate the effects of climate change is understandable, resorting to high-risk, poorly-understood solutions like SRM is not justifiable, especially when better alternatives exist. The article insists that focusing on proven strategies and understanding their long-term consequences is the path to true climate mitigation and justice.
